Have the Ramblers gone completely mad?

I’m horrified to discover that the main Board of the Ramblers is proposing to close down their Scottish and Welsh offices making 14 staff redundant. Each office could be replaced by two people who will work from home, on reduced salaries.

I’m not certain about what goes on in Wales but as someone who has served as president of Ramblers Scotland on two separate 3-year terms and is currently a Vice President I am aware of the high quality of the staff in the Scottish office in Milnathort, staff that could shortly be served with redundancy notices. Why is this happening? Because of a shortfall in donations, apparently caused by the recession, the Ramblers feel they have to make budget cuts of £1M and £300,000 of those cuts will land in Scotland.

This proposal by the Ramblers Board has potentially catastrophic consequences. The Land Reform (Scotland) Act is still in its infancy and it is absolutely vital that the Ramblers have a strong and active presence in Scotland to campaign against the various issues that will arise. The organisation must be able to continue with the Court of Session case in March 2010 with the Euan Snowie appeal – the outcome has huge implications for the implementation of our right to roam legislation in Scotland. Another Anne Gloag-type outcome would be disastrous for the future of the legislation and would affect all of us who have come to cherish the access provisions of the Act.

We have to remember that the majority of visitors who come here to walk from England and other European countries see Scotland as a country that enjoys the best access legislation in the world.

For some time now I’ve been concerned by the London-centric attitude of the Ramblers who seem to becoming too involved in ‘walking for health’ and promoting ‘urban walking’ at the expense of countryside and wild land walking. This ‘London-centricity’ of Ramblers  has gone from bad to worse, with the latest example being the London urban skyline that is printed as a footer on the emails that I receive from the Ramblers. What’s all that about?

Over the last few years the work that has been carried out by Ramblers Scotland is exemplary and members appreciate that. The latest issue of Climber magazine (July 09, p 35) contains this comment by my good friend, the well respected outdoors writer and journalist, Ed Douglas:

“At the moment, however, many conservation agencies will wonder what such issues have got to do with the BMC,  Isn’t it just a sporting organisation?  It often looks like one.  But that’s not a question that gets asked of the Ramblers’ in Scotland, where Dave Morris and and his team have defended Scotland’s wild places with terrier-like ferocity for decades and made valuable contributions to policy and legislation”.

There is also a paranoia within the Ramblers about rights of ways in the Home Counties, even though, according to many, the right of way situation in England has improved enormously, both on the ground and in legislative terms, and yet the Ramblers maintain a huge section of their staff in London to fight this cause. Read these words by John Andrews, a long time RA member who has worked on these issues until very recently. Indeed he was made a life member of the Ramblers for the work he had done on rights of ways;

“The great majority of people that run the Ramblers in London do not understand how different the organization is in Scotland and how differently everything works. In Scotland we are in the early stages of implementing the Land Reform legislation. We need lots of support for this and staff in London cannot help – they have virtually no knowledge of the legislation itself, its origins, how it is applied today and the issues that arise on the ground. In England the need for the Ramblers to have a big rights of way team in their London office is fading because most of the legislative work has been done. So much has already been achieved. There is only one outstanding legal case which I also happen to be involved in from the days when I lived in England. We do not need to preserve a large team of people working in the London office on rights of way. For 30-35 years I worked very closely with the Ramblers rights of way team in London and over the last two years have worked with Scottish staff since I moved to live near Perth. The need for staff support is far greater in Scotland because of the stage that we are at with the Land Reform legislation. The Ramblers needs to focus its resources on Scottish access legislation and the big challenges that we face in securing its successful implementation.”

This fully concurs with a letter I received from Hugh Westacott, a walking holiday operator and well known writer, who complained that the Ramblers were wasting their resources on rights of way in England since the main problems have long been eradicated. My own suspicion is that there is more to this than budget cuts. Dave Morris, director of Ramblers Scotland, is a skilled, eloquent and hard working political operator. I would go as far as to say that it had not been for him and Alan Blackshaw, we wouldn’t have been successful in the Land Reform campaign here in Scotland. As President at the time of that campaign I worked very closely with Dave and was constantly astounded by his tactical skill and political knowledge. I know for a fact that there are those on the Ramblers board who see Dave Morris as something of a maverick, with too much power. There are also those on the board who are of the opinion that the Scots, generally, are oversubsidised as a nation and at the moment, with a deeply unpopular Scots Prime Minister and Chancellor, it’s simply not cool to be Scots.

If the Ramblers continue with their proposal to make their most effective operator and campaigner, and his excellent team, redundant, then it will be utter madness. Chief Executive Tom Franklin should be taking a close look at the motives behind his board’s proposal and root out and get rid of those who have come up with this nonsensical plan. If he doesn’t, then I fear it could be the beginning of the end for the Ramblers, an organisation with a long and proud record, especially so here in Scotland. 

Below: Alan Blackshaw, Dave Morris, Pauline McNeil MSP and Rennie McOwan celebrating the publication of the Land Reform (Scotland) Act, the future of which could be in doubt if the London Ramblers board get their way

 

 

10 Responses to “Have the Ramblers gone completely mad?”

  1. Peewiglet Says:

    Hi Cameron,

    Thanks for drawing attention to this. I read it having seen what Chris T. wrote on his blog this morning.

    It sounds to me as though the best outcome might well be for the Scottish branch to break away from the rest of the Ramblers, and go forwards independently. Any chance that that might happen?

  2. Trevor D Gamble Says:

    Could not Lottery grants money be found to preserve the staff jobs to fight for Scottish walkers rights, as the Ramblers is a registered charity after all?

  3. cameron Says:

    Breaking away is an option but that wouldn’t protect the seven staff jobs. The prefered option at the moment is to try and raise enough money to keep the Scottish office going for at least another year. To this end Denis Canavan, the Ramblers Scotland convenor, has today launched an appeal for £200,000. Details on the Ramblers website on http://www.ramblers.org.uk/scotland/press/

    Meanwhile, Trevor, I don’t think Lottery money would be available. As many organisations are discovering, the great bulk of Lottery money is going towards the London Olympics. Many NGO’s have already had their subsidies and grants cut because of this.

  4. Baz Says:

    Cameron,

    I’m also here from Chris’s blog posting and am taken aback at this proposal. I’ll be keeping an eye on the situation and if not remedied will consider my membership. I love the ramblers and all the great work they do, but sometimes you just have to make a stand.
    As a Mancunion exiled to Berkshire for the last 12 years, this continued Londonisation of things still annoys me.

  5. cameron Says:

    Thanks Baz,
    The Convenor of Ramblers Scotland, Denis Canavan, has just launched a fund raising campaign to raise enough money to see Ramblers Scotland through the next year. The feeling is that if the problem is about finance then the recession is temporary and things will hopefully improve in a year’s time. However, I think Ramblers members should be asking themselves if the Ramblers HQ should really be in London or in some area closer to their traditional heartlands, ie Manchester or Sheffield, where the staff might be a tad closer to reality?

  6. Christopher Gibson Says:

    Cameron
    The view further south is that this is being led by Tom Franklin and the Board are doing what he wants. Your para should be the other way round.

  7. cameron Says:

    Hi Christopher,
    As you can well imagine, that wasn’t the way it was explained to me, but thanks for that - very interesting…

  8. Neil Says:

    I can’t help but wonder if this unfortunate development could present a good opportunity for structural change amongst the numerous organisations ‘representing’ hill goers and other mountain users.

    If one was able to compare the Scottish membership databases of Ramblers, MCofS, John Muir Trust, BMC and others I am sure there would be significant overlap. On access as a policy area for example where would the interests of Ramblers differ from MCofS members? Hardly if at all.

    Small organisations struggle to raise the ‘working capital’ they need to survive and operate in a sustainable way. Why not use this chance to convene a meeting of all those interested in protecting the Scottish upland environment with a view to forming one single powerful organisation?

    Just a thought…

  9. cameron Says:

    Mmm, the Ramblers are quite different from the MCof S in that the organisation is ostensibly a network of walking groups - the campaigning side makes full use of the membership of 140,000, most of whom have little interest in campaigning. And the Ramblers don’t promote climbing or mountaineering. On the other hand, I can’t imagine MCof S getting involved in urban walking groups or walking for health groups. The John Muir Trust is principally a land-owning organisation, very different from both Ramblers and MCof S. I think it’s necessary to have all these organisations fit and healthy. What I’m not so sure about is why Ramblers in London think it’s so necessary to have such a huge rights of way team. From what I’m told by insiders there isn’t the need for a lot of rights of way campaigning any morebut there is still a form of ‘paranoia’amongst Home Counties Ramblers Board members about this issue.

  10. John Manning Says:

    In honesty, I can sympathise with the need for a rights of way team within the Ramblers. Even here in t’Yorkshu Dales - a flagship National Pleasure Park - there are plenty of path problems: within two miles of this village I can think of landowners diverting and closing paths without reference to any proper authority, and paths that should have been registered as such years back but have been allowed to vanish, conveniently for those whose land they cross. They’re still fighting erosion in the 3 peaks area even now. Some organisation has got to alert the NP and the local authority to those kind of issues, and work with them to get it sorted out.

    But that kind of thing should not detract from what the Ramblers do in Scotland, which is even more important as it sets a benchmark for what we should be aspiring to here in Southern Britain.

    In northern England CROW has had a great effect, opening up vast tracts of open countryside. But in the south, even in supposedly outdoorsy places like the North and South Downs, a lot of CROW land is restricted to the odd field, small patch of downland or woodland. The rights of way network is the vital thread that links these important areas together; if it falls into disrepair, or falls victim to abuse with no one to defend it, then the value of the access land is degraded also. Until there’s a general principle of infinite responsible access everywhere in the UK – and I think I mean “everywhere” - then the rights of way network in England and Wales is invaluable.

    The Ramblers need to fight on all these fronts, to represent their members’ interests north and south and west of the border. Writing off Wales and Scotland in the way they’re proposing, while focussing on inner city on-foot commuting and health issues, while very worthy, is just the opposite of that. I can’t think of anything I could compare it to, other than perhaps Churchill and Eisenhower agreeing that they could no longer afford to fight a war in Europe and the Pacific, so instead deciding to concentrate on inner city policing.

    (What a lame comparison, I’m ashamed!)

Leave a Reply