<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ramblers Scotland -latest developments</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cameronmcneish.co.uk/2009/06/ramblers-scotland-latest-developments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cameronmcneish.co.uk/2009/06/ramblers-scotland-latest-developments/</link>
	<description>The Wilderness World of Cameron McNeish</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 06:57:58 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Paul Webster</title>
		<link>http://www.cameronmcneish.co.uk/2009/06/ramblers-scotland-latest-developments/#comment-3398</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Webster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 10:35:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cameronmcneish.co.uk/?p=364#comment-3398</guid>
		<description>I think we need two separate organisations Neil. Though there is an overlap where both the MCofS and the Ramblers have a shared interest (and can work together), both organisations also have different roles.

e.g.  The MCofS also represents climbers and mountaineers, whereas the Ramblers have a role speaking up for those taking the dog out for a walk near their home. These are not the same thing and I think merging could lead to a confused organisation with less than clear objectives. I'm sure there are many Ramblers members who'd never consider themselves a mountaineer (or go up a mountain) and likewise MCofS members who aren't really interested in short country or even urban walks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think we need two separate organisations Neil. Though there is an overlap where both the MCofS and the Ramblers have a shared interest (and can work together), both organisations also have different roles.</p>
<p>e.g.  The MCofS also represents climbers and mountaineers, whereas the Ramblers have a role speaking up for those taking the dog out for a walk near their home. These are not the same thing and I think merging could lead to a confused organisation with less than clear objectives. I&#8217;m sure there are many Ramblers members who&#8217;d never consider themselves a mountaineer (or go up a mountain) and likewise MCofS members who aren&#8217;t really interested in short country or even urban walks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil Davidson Cuthbert</title>
		<link>http://www.cameronmcneish.co.uk/2009/06/ramblers-scotland-latest-developments/#comment-3385</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil Davidson Cuthbert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 09:51:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cameronmcneish.co.uk/?p=364#comment-3385</guid>
		<description>If there is a will for breaking with London then the possibility of combining with MCofS to create a stronger voice in Scotland for the outdoors community should be considered as an option.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If there is a will for breaking with London then the possibility of combining with MCofS to create a stronger voice in Scotland for the outdoors community should be considered as an option.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

